Big Oil gives back the war premium: XOM 11% off its Oct 30 high
ExxonMobil closed Friday at $165.87, up 0.34% on the day — but 11% below its October 30 closing high of $187.25, and down 11.42% over five days. Chevron is down 9.73% over the same span. The fade tracks crude, not earnings: Exxon's third-quarter earnings were $17.5 billion.
📊 Scorecard: our Bearish call on $XOM is scored from $165.87, the last close before it ran. Its first result comes after the next close.
The News
ExxonMobil closed Friday, November 6, at $165.87, up 0.34% on the day — but 11% below its October 30 closing high of $187.25, and down 11.42% over five days. Chevron closed at $212.61, down 0.15% on the day and 9.73% over five days. The energy sector fund XLE had gained about 45% for the year through November 4, even after falling about 9% from its October 30 high. The pattern is the same across the sector: the war premium — the extra price oil carried because traders feared a war would cut off supply — is coming out of the stocks, a week after it went in.
The fade tracks crude, not earnings. Exxon's third-quarter adjusted earnings were $17.5 billion, with refining margins — the profit from turning crude oil into petrol and diesel — nearly triple fourth-quarter 2025 levels, at an indicative margin of $50.3 a barrel against $18.3. Chevron's downstream business earned $4.9 billion, against $1.1 billion a year earlier. DZ Bank cut Exxon to Sell with a $170 price target on November 4, a target only just above the current price — a call that the stocks had run too far on a price spike that was never going to last.
The forward curve now sets the read. The US Energy Information Administration's October outlook, released October 6 with the next edition due November 10, forecasts Brent averaging $96 a barrel in 2026 and falling to $84 in 2027. And a Bloomberg survey published November 7 says the group's output rose 930,000 barrels a day in October to 22.8 million barrels a day, roughly 88% of what the same members pumped in February, led by Saudi Arabia. Supply is returning even as the strait stays effectively closed — and that is bearish for the war premium, whatever the daily headlines say.
The fade tracks crude, not earnings — Exxon's third-quarter earnings were $17.5 billion.
Why It Matters
A war premium is rent, not value. It is the extra price the market pays for fear, and it leaves the moment the fear does — which is what happened this week. Exxon and Chevron are genuinely profitable companies with genuinely strong refining margins, but their stocks spent October priced as if crude would stay above $110, and crude is now under $100 with the forward curve pointing to $84 next year. The gap between the price and the business is the trade, and the gap is closing from the wrong side.
That is why the verdict is Bearish. DZ Bank's Sell call with a $170 target — barely above the current price — is the analyst community catching up with what the market already knows: the spike is over, the supply is coming back, and the stocks that rode the spike have further to fall before they are priced for the business rather than the war.
Analyst's Take
Our call is Bearish. The stocks did not fall because the companies stumbled — they fell because the reason they rose has gone. The war premium was a price for fear, and fear does not last: Brent is back under $100, OPEC output is creeping back toward pre-war levels, and the forward curve points down, to $84 in 2027. A stock that rose on a spike and falls on its fade is a stock priced for a war, not for a business, and the war's price is coming out.
What to watch: the EIA's next outlook, due November 10, which will reset the forward curve; whether OPEC's November 29 meeting, which sets 2027 output targets, keeps supply tight or lets more back; and whether Exxon and Chevron hold their current levels or follow crude lower. The earnings are strong, the refining margins are excellent — and none of it matters while crude is falling.
Are you bullish or bearish on this story?
By The Numbers
FAQ
How far have the oil majors actually fallen?
ExxonMobil closed Friday, November 6, at $165.87, up 0.34% on the day but 11% below its October 30 closing high of $187.25 and down 11.42% over five days. Chevron closed at $212.61, down 0.15% on the day and 9.73% over five days. The energy sector fund XLE had gained about 45% for the year through November 4, even after falling about 9% from its October 30 high.
What is the "war premium"?
The extra price oil carries because traders fear a war will cut off supply. When fighting broke out, Brent rose because traders priced in the risk that the Strait of Hormuz — through which about a fifth of the world's oil moves — could be closed. When the fighting eases or the claims do not hold up, that premium comes out of the price, even if nothing about actual supply has changed.
Did Exxon and Chevron report bad earnings?
No. Exxon's third-quarter adjusted earnings were $17.5 billion, with refining margins — the profit from turning crude oil into petrol and diesel — nearly triple fourth-quarter 2025 levels, at an indicative margin of $50.3 a barrel against $18.3. Chevron's downstream business earned $4.9 billion, against $1.1 billion a year earlier. The stocks fell because crude fell, not because the companies stumbled.
What do analysts think now?
DZ Bank cut Exxon to Sell with a $170 price target on November 4 — a target only just above the current price. The cut came as the war premium was fading, and it reflects the view that the stocks had run too far on the back of a price spike that was never going to last.
What does the forward curve say?
The US Energy Information Administration's October outlook, released October 6 with the next edition due November 10, forecasts Brent averaging $96 a barrel in 2026 and falling to $84 in 2027. The forward curve — the price the market expects in future months — now sets the read, not the war.
👁
Source: TIKR / EIA / Summa Money / Bloomberg (OPEC survey)